- Faith Activist
- Posts
- Elihu Was a True Voice for God
Elihu Was a True Voice for God
The overlooked young man in Job’s story may have more to teach us than we think.

When we read through the book of Job, many of us breathe a sigh of relief upon reaching God’s thundering response in chapter 38. Finally, we think, truth has arrived. But what do we do with the six chapters before that chapters filled with the voice of a young man named Elihu?
Elihu appears suddenly in Job 32 and speaks at length until chapter 37. He is neither rebuked by God like Job’s other three friends nor acknowledged directly in God’s final words. That silence has left many scholars and readers wondering: Was Elihu speaking truth or not? Was he helpful or merely loud?
For years, many theologians and commentators dismissed Elihu as arrogant or redundant. However, a closer look at the biblical text, supported by insights from church history and careful theological reflection, suggests that Elihu may have been exactly what he claimed to be: a Spirit-inspired prophet, delivering a needed word in a critical moment.
The Legacy of Misunderstanding
Of twelve scholarly commentaries consulted in recent years, eleven offered a negative view of Elihu. The criticisms vary some say his speeches are stylistically inferior, others claim he offers nothing new. A few go as far as suggesting his words were a later addition to the text. Yet these arguments often rest on subjective stylistic preferences or assumptions about literary consistency.
And yet, historical voices like John Calvin viewed Elihu quite differently. Calvin considered him a “true doctor of the church,” aligning his theology closely with that of God’s own words in the whirlwind. In fact, Calvin admired Elihu’s understanding of God’s justice, providence, and the depth of human sin.
Gregory the Great and Thomas Aquinas also recognized Elihu’s teaching as orthodox, though they criticized what they perceived to be pride in his tone. Interestingly, Elihu is the only speaker in Job given a Hebrew name, and his lineage is carefully detailed (Job 32:2), hinting at a person of weight and purpose in the narrative.
When Elihu bursts onto the scene, he is angry angry at Job for justifying himself instead of God, and angry at Job’s three friends for their inability to answer Job convincingly (Job 32:2–3). Some label him an "angry young man," but righteous anger is not inherently sinful. Jesus Himself displayed anger when God’s honor was at stake (Mark 3:5; John 2:15–17). Elihu’s indignation reflects a passionate concern for truth, not personal offense.
Even more compelling is Elihu’s claim to spiritual inspiration. He declares that it is the “breath of the Almighty” that gives him understanding (Job 32:8). Later, he describes being so filled with divine insight that he must speak or burst (Job 32:18–20). Unlike the false prophets elsewhere in Scripture who are rebuked or exposed Elihu is not corrected. In fact, he is never condemned at all, either by God or Job.
This silence may be the author’s way of affirming Elihu’s role as a legitimate and prophetic voice, not a theological lightweight. If Elihu was mistaken or arrogant, it would be reasonable for God to say so. But He doesn’t.
Style Is Not the Same as Substance
Critics often attack Elihu’s speeches for being long-winded or pompous. But such judgments reveal more about our modern sensibilities than the text itself. Biblical Hebrew poetry like Job is known for its repetition and layered meaning. What seems verbose to us may have been brilliantly layered and nuanced to the original audience.
Besides, truth is not measured by eloquence. Even Paul admitted that his preaching was not marked by rhetorical flair (1 Corinthians 2:1–5), yet he spoke with the authority of God.
Elihu vs. the Three Friends
A common misconception is that Elihu simply repeats what Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar already said. That’s not the case.
The three friends insisted Job must have sinned to deserve his suffering. Elihu, on the other hand, offered a different and more nuanced perspective. He suggested that suffering can be a tool God uses to correct, instruct, or prevent sin (Job 33:19–30; 36:10–15). Elihu also emphasized God’s justice and transcendence, correcting Job’s assertion that God was unjust.
Whereas the friends condemned Job harshly, Elihu showed a degree of compassion and respect. He called Job by name (Job 33:1, 31; 37:14) something the other three never did. He patiently referenced Job’s arguments, responding thoughtfully. Scholar Katharine Dell notes that Elihu behaves like “a listening friend” who carefully seeks to understand before speaking.
Elihu’s distinction is perhaps best summarized by Hywel Jones “The friends said that Job was suffering because he had sinned. Elihu says that Job has sinned because he was suffering.” That difference, though subtle, is vital. It transforms Elihu’s rebuke from condemnation to correction.
Elihu’s Message Aligns with God’s
The most compelling reason to view Elihu favorably is the continuity between his speeches and God’s own words in chapters 38–41. Elihu prepares the ground for the Lord’s entrance, emphasizing God’s sovereignty, justice, and inscrutability.
The transition from Elihu’s final speech to God’s whirlwind response is seamless. There’s no jarring contradiction only amplification. If Elihu had been offering a misguided or false resolution to Job’s suffering, we would expect a sharp correction from God. But instead, God picks up where Elihu leaves off, reinforcing and expanding on the same themes.
As Calvin recognized, Elihu’s theology fits within the larger tapestry of divine wisdom. He affirms that no human being has merit before God, that suffering may serve a divine purpose, and that God’s providence is often beyond human comprehension.
Why Elihu Still Matters
In today’s culture, we’re often quick to dismiss the young or the unpolished. Elihu is a reminder that truth can come from unexpected places, even from someone who hasn’t yet earned a seat at the table. His voice, unfiltered and earnest, cuts through the noise not with answers that tie up suffering into a neat theological package, but with a reverent call to trust the God who knows more than we do.
He speaks to Job, not against him. He defends God’s justice without mocking Job’s pain. He prepares the way for the Lord not as a rival, but as a herald.
Perhaps it’s time we let Elihu speak again not just in the text, but in our churches, our studies, and our theology. Because the young man in Job might just be telling the truth we’re desperate to hear.
If this gave you new insight into a forgotten voice of Scripture, share it with someone who loves the Word or subscribe to our newsletter to receive more biblical reflections each week.
Reply