True Justice Requires More Than Outrage

Some say laughter is contagious, but in today’s online world, it’s anger that spreads the quickest. If you’ve spent any time on social media platforms like TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), or even just skimmed the comments section of news articles, you’ve likely noticed the growing tide of outrage. This seems to be the emotion of choice for armchair activists—those who shout about injustice from the comfort of their couches.

While it’s natural to feel outraged by injustice, how we channel that anger matters. Responding with vitriol or hashtags like #burn and #die doesn’t advance the cause of justice; it only adds fuel to the “outrage economy” and turns social media into a battlefield, deepening divides and escalating tensions.

The Role of Social Media in Justice Work

It’s important to recognize that social media itself isn’t the enemy of justice. Platforms like Instagram and X can quickly spread awareness of human rights abuses, elevate charitable organizations, and offer fresh perspectives on social issues. But the same tool that can be used for good can also cause harm, especially when it’s used to vent anger rather than to foster meaningful change.

Outrage: Is It Really About the Cause?

Let’s be honest: many angry social media rants are more about us than the cause we claim to support. It’s a quick and easy way to blow off steam while projecting our moral outrage onto a public platform—without having to leave our living rooms. Each retweet, “like,” or “share” reinforces the illusion that we’ve contributed to the greater good, giving us a fleeting rush of dopamine that tricks us into feeling we’ve made a difference.

But there’s a fundamental problem with this approach: using social media as our primary outlet for activism might provide personal satisfaction, but it doesn’t translate into meaningful impact.

The Trap of Slacktivism

In his article “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted,” Malcolm Gladwell highlights the limitations of what he calls “slacktivism.” He explains that social media activism often motivates people to take easy, low-effort actions—like sharing a post or tweeting—rather than making real sacrifices that could lead to significant change.

This is a stark contrast to the strategic, organized activism of past movements like civil rights and women’s suffrage, where people committed their time, energy, and even safety to the cause. Today, millions of people will share a charitable post on social media, but only a small percentage will donate or take further action. As UNICEF bluntly puts it, “Likes don’t save lives. Money does.”

While social media can raise awareness, studies show that “morally outraged tweets” tend to circulate within echo chambers of like-minded individuals. This means your angry post about gun control is likely to be seen only by those who already agree with you, rather than challenging or informing those outside your ideological bubble.

Outrage Doesn’t Solve Problems

Although anger over injustice is often justified, turning the internet ablaze with fits of rage rarely leads to meaningful change. Online outcry over cases like Brock Turner’s lenient sentence for sexual assault or public demands for the death penalty for terrorists might generate attention, but they don’t address the root causes of these issues or offer solutions.

Real-world activism—like working to change policies, supporting victims, or educating communities—can address the underlying problems that fuel injustice. Angry social media posts, on the other hand, often trivialize the hard work done by those on the front lines, reducing complex issues to oversimplified soundbites.

The Importance of the Process

Social media offers little room for nuance. The brevity of posts encourages oversimplification, leading to hasty conclusions and the spread of misinformation. Worse, it can result in speaking on behalf of others without fully understanding their needs or perspectives.

Justice work requires patience, commitment, and the willingness to engage in inclusive, thoughtful conversations. It’s a process that involves not just seeking outcomes, but also investing in the journey—building relationships, understanding context, and working collaboratively to address root causes. This kind of sustained, real-world engagement can’t be replicated through social media alone.

The Need for Sustainable Activism

Anger can be a powerful motivator, but it’s not a sustainable source of energy for long-term justice work. Anger tends to drain us, leading to burnout rather than sustained activism. What truly sustains us are relationships—real, face-to-face connections with people who can provide support, encouragement, and accountability.

Justice isn’t something that can be achieved from a virtual soapbox. It’s the product of a community of committed individuals who are willing to do the hard work of addressing the underlying causes of injustice. As Martin Luther King Jr. warned, we must avoid the temptation to rest content with superficial analyses that deal only with symptoms rather than causes.

Thank goodness he didn’t limit himself to 140 characters.

As you consider how to engage with social justice issues, remember that while social media has its place, true justice work requires more than outrage. It requires commitment, thoughtful action, and a willingness to engage deeply with the issues at hand. Let’s move beyond the quick fix of an angry tweet and commit to the long, challenging journey of making a real difference.

If you found this article helpful, consider sharing it with someone who might benefit from it, or subscribe to our newsletter for more insights on living out your faith in today’s world.